The Intersection of Meat Consumption, Water Scarcity and Climate Change

Authors

  • Kush Kalra NMIMS Chandigarh Author
  • Khaleeq Ahmed Uttaranchal University image/svg+xml Author

Keywords:

Meat consumption, vegetarian diet, climate change, water footprint, water scarcity

Abstract

The intersection of meat consumption, water scarcity, and climate change is a pressing global issue with far-reaching environmental implications. Meat production is a resource-intensive process that contributes significantly to water scarcity and climate change. This paper explores the complex relationship between meat consumption, water scarcity, and climate change, examining the water footprint and greenhouse gas emissions associated with different types of meat production. Meat production is a major contributor to water scarcity, with large quantities of water being used for animal drinking, feed crop irrigation, and processing. Additionally, meat production is a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions, particularly methane from livestock and carbon dioxide from deforestation for pasture and feed crops. These emissions contribute to global warming and climate change, leading to more frequent and severe weather events, rising sea levels, and other environmental impacts. To mitigate these impacts, there is a need for sustainable practices and policies that promote reduced meat consumption and more efficient meat production methods. Strategies such as adopting plant-based diets, promoting sustainable meat production practices, and implementing technological innovations can help reduce the environmental impact of meat production. However, several challenges exist, including cultural preferences, economic interests, and lack of awareness. Overcoming these challenges will require collaborative efforts from governments, businesses, and civil society to promote sustainable food systems and reduce the environmental impact of meat consumption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

González, N. et al. (2020) Meat consumption: Which are the current global risks? A review of recent (2010-2020) evidences, Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.). Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7256495/:~:text=Although%20meat%20means%20an%20important,water%20pollution%2C%20and%20water%20scarcity (Accessed: 12 April 2024).

Elferink, M. (2024) Global demand for food is rising. can we meet it?, Harvard Business Review. Available at: https://hbr.org/2016/04/global-demand-for-food-is-rising-can-we-meet-it (Accessed: 12 April 2024)

leenes , G. (2013) The water footprint of poultry, pork and beef: A comparative study in different countries and production systems, Water Resources and Industry. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212371713000024#:~:text=Animal%20products%20have%20a%20particularly,WF%20of%20grains%20%5B31%5D (Accessed: 12 April 2024).

Mekonnen, M.M. and Hoekstra, A.Y. (2012) A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products - ecosystems, SpringerLink. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10021-011-9517-8#citeas (Accessed: 12 April 2024).

Bonnet , C. (2020) Viewpoint: Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and Animal Welfare, Sciencedirect. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306919220300312 (Accessed: 12 April 2024).

Pitesky, M. (2009) Clearing the Air: Livestock’s contribution to climate change, Sciencedirect. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065211309030016 (Accessed: 12 April 2024)

Red and processed meat in the context of health and the environment: many shades of red and green (2023) World health organisation. Available at: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/370775/9789240074828-eng.pdf?sequence=1#:~:text=Excess%20consumption%20of%20red%20meat,compounds%20(12%2C%2013) (Accessed: 12 April 2024).

Paola, A., Rulli, M. and Santini, M. (2017) Human food vs. animal feed debate. A thorough analysis of environmental footprints | Request PDF, Research gate . Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318399500_Human_food_vs_animal_feed_debate_A_thorough_analysis_of_environmental_footprints (Accessed: 12 April 2024).

Hyland , J. et al. (2016) Improving livestock production efficiencies presents a major opportunity to reduce sectoral greenhouse gas emissions, Agricultural Systems. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308521X16302323 (Accessed: 12 April 2024).

Methane emissions are driving climate change. here’s how to reduce them. (2021) UNEP. Available at: https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/methane-emissions-are-driving-climate-change-heres-how-reduce-them (Accessed: 12 April 2024).

Kite, K. (2023) Farm animal welfare: A review of standard practices and their effects, Faunalytics. Available at: https://faunalytics.org/farm-animal-welfare-a-review-of-standard-practices-and-their-effects/ (Accessed: 12 April 2024).

Hoekstra, A.Y. (2017) Water Footprint Assessment: Evolvement of a new research field - water resources management, SpringerLink. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11269-017-1618-5 (Accessed: 12 April 2024).

Gheewala, S.H. et al. (2014) Water footprint and impact of water consumption for food, feed, fuel crops production in Thailand, MDPI. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/6/6/1698 (Accessed: 12 April 2024).

Chahed , J. (2022) Water Footprint & Water Colors: Blue Water, green water, Grey Water & Virtual Water | Researchgate, Researchgate . Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Water_Footprint_Water_Colors_Blue_Water_Green_Water_Grey_Water_Virtual_Water (Accessed: 12 April 2024).

Downloads

Published

2026-08-26

Issue

Section

Research Article