Artificial Intelligence and Child Rights in India: Addressing Online Safety, Privacy and Regulatory Challenges in the Digital Age
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Child Rights, Online Safety, Digital Privacy, Algorithmic Discrimination, AI Governance, Constitutional RightsAbstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become deeply embedded in the digital lives of children, influencing the ways in which they learn, communicate, access information, play, and participate in online spaces. AI-powered educational applications, recommendation systems, social media platforms, online games, virtual assistants, and generative AI tools offer considerable opportunities for learning, creativity, accessibility, and social participation. At the same time, their growing use has created serious concerns relating to children's privacy, behavioural profiling, algorithmic discrimination, exposure to harmful content, online exploitation, deepfakes, and psychological well-being. These concerns acquire particular significance because children, owing to their age and evolving capacities, may be disproportionately affected by automated and data-driven systems whose functioning is often difficult to understand or challenge. This paper examines these emerging concerns through a doctrinal and comparative legal approach, drawing upon constitutional provisions, legislation, judicial decisions, international child-rights instruments, regulatory frameworks, and relevant empirical and policy reports. Particular attention is given to the guarantees of equality, non-discrimination, privacy, dignity, and personal liberty under Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution of India and their relevance to algorithmic decision-making affecting children. The paper critically evaluates the adequacy of the Information Technology Act, 2000, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 in responding to AI-enabled risks. It also considers the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and comparative regulatory developments, particularly the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act. The central argument of the paper is that India's existing legal framework provides important protections against particular digital harms but does not yet adequately address the design, deployment, transparency, discriminatory effects, and accountability of AI systems affecting children. It therefore advocates a child-centred and constitutionally grounded approach to AI governance that combines technological innovation with privacy, equality, safety, transparency, accountability, and the best interests of the child.
Downloads
References
Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach 1–12 (Pearson Education, 4th edn., 2021).
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), Policy Guidance on AI for Children 14–20 (UNICEF, 2021).
UNICEF and International Telecommunication Union, How Many Children and Young People Have Internet Access at Home? Estimating Digital Connectivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic 5–7 (UNICEF, New York, 2020).
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence 17–22 (UNESCO, Paris, 2021).
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.
NITI Aayog, Responsible AI #AIForAll: Approach Document for India, Part 1 – Principles for Responsible AI 25–34 (Government of India, New Delhi, 2021).
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989, arts. 3, 12, 16, 17 and 19.
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 25 (2021) on Children's Rights in Relation to the Digital Environment, UN Doc. CRC/C/GC/25, paras. 12–21, 67–78 (2021).
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), Policy Guidance on AI for Children 10–16 (UNICEF, 2021).
UNICEF Office of Strategy and Evidence–Innocenti, Snapshot of AI Usage and Concerns Among Children and Parents: Insights from 10 Countries (2026); UNICEF, “Children are Adopting AI Technologies More Than Three Times Faster Than Adults,” Statement, June 30, 2026.
UNICEF, Annual Report 2025: Continuing to Deliver for Children, in Crises and Beyond (2026).
Fengchun Miao and Wayne Holmes, Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research 21–28 (UNESCO, Paris, 2023).
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), Policy Guidance on AI for Children, supra note 15, at 20–24.
E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1974) 4 SCC 3.
