Reimagining Child Rights in the Digital Age: Constitutionalism, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of Child-Centered Governance in India
Keywords:
Child Rights, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Governance, UNCRC, Algorithmic Accountability, Constitutional LawAbstract
The digital transformation of society has revolutionised the definition of childhood. Today's children engage with AI-powered systems, social media, algorithm-driven suggestions, and data-informed technology that influence their learning, communication, and personal growth. These technologies present unparalleled opportunities for participation and empowerment, but also new and enhanced threats to children, including surveillance, profiling, privacy violations, behavioral manipulation and online exploitation. There are currently existing laws that were designed for physical settings that are not so well suited to the new issues. This article proposes that the current child rights discourse in India needs to be shifted from a welfare paradigm to a child centred paradigm of digital governance. The article explores the implications of AI and digital technologies for the concepts of privacy, autonomy, dignity and development, drawing on the principles of the constitution and existing statutes, international child rights law, and judicial rulings. It argues that protecting children's rights is not merely a question of consent-based regulation but necessitates the inclusion of such protections in technologies and systems of governance. Proposed is a framework based on the principles of privacy-by-design, safety-by-design, algorithmic accountability, transparency and meaningful child participation.
Downloads
References
Sonia Livingstone and Alicia Blum-Ross, Parenting for a Digital Future (Oxford University Press, 2020).
Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. 98 (2017) (Supreme Court of the United States).
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989, arts. 13, 15 and 17.
Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 25 (2021) on Children's Rights in Relation to the Digital Environment, UN Doc. CRC/C/GC/25 (2021).
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015; Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012; Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
Constitution of India, arts. 14 and 15(3).
Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi, (1981) 1 SCC 608.
Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka, (1992) 3 SCC 666.
Unni Krishnan, J.P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1993) 1 SCC 645.
M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1996) 6 SCC 756.
Sheela Barse v. Union of India, (1986) 3 SCC 596.
Sampurna Behura v. Union of India, (2018) 4 SCC 433.
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.
Bărbulescu v. Romania, Application No. 61496/08, Judgment dated 5 September 2017 (Grand Chamber, European Court of Human Rights).
Sonia Livingstone and Alicia Blum-Ross, Parenting for a Digital Future (Oxford University Press, 2020).
Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism (Profile Books, 2019).
Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 25 (2021) on Children's Rights in Relation to the Digital Environment, UN Doc. CRC/C/GC/25 (2021).
Ibid.
Virginia Eubanks, Automating Inequality (St. Martin's Press, 2018).
