The Issue of Phone Tapping and Recent Developments in Light of Right to Privacy

Authors

  • Ashwin Singh Author
  • Sakshi Dutta Author

Keywords:

Phone Tapping, Right to Privacy, Telegraph Act, Surveillance

Abstract

This article examines the legality of phone tapping in India against the evolving right to privacy. It analyses judicial developments from PUCL to K.S. Puttaswamy, constitutional protections under Articles 19 and 21, and statutory interception powers under the Telegraph Act. The study evaluates proportionality, executive safeguards, and recent judicial applications restricting unlawful surveillance. It argues that although interception may serve legitimate security objectives, inadequate regulation and outdated legal provisions threaten individual liberties. The article recommends comprehensive surveillance legislation balancing national security, effective investigation, and privacy through clear procedures, accountability, and constitutional compliance while ensuring transparent oversight, judicial review, democratic legitimacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ashwin Singh

    Symbiosis Law School, Pune

  • Sakshi Dutta

    Symbiosis Law School, Pune

References

1. Jagadeesh, P., 2020. Right to Privacy v. Phone Tapping. Nyaayshastra L. Rev., 1, p.1.

2. San John, A., 2022. The Legality of Phone Tapping in India: Analysing the Cross Jurisdictional

Positions. Legal Spectrum J., 2, p.1.

3. Agrawal, R., 2018. India connected: How the smartphone is transforming the world’s largest

democracy. Oxford University Press.

4. Maims, P.V., 2021. An Analysis of Laws Relating to Phone Tapping in India. Indian JL &

Legal Rsch., 3, p.1.

5. Chaitanya Ramachandran, PUCL v. Union of India Revisited: Why India’s Surveillance Law

Must be Redesigned for the Digital Age, 7 N UJS L. REV. 105, 106 (2014).

6. People’s Union of Civil Liberties v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 568.

7. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-15

Issue

Section

Research Article