A Socio-Legal Study of Students’ Right to Protest: Challenges and Remedies

Authors

  • Mannat Singh Author
  • Prof. (Dr.) Anuj Kumar Vaksha Author

Keywords:

Educational Institutions, Article 19, University Governance, Peaceful Protest

Abstract

This article examines the scope and limitations of students’ right to protest in educational institutions from a socio-legal perspective. It analyses constitutional protections under Article 19 alongside competing rights to education, privacy, public order, and institutional discipline. The study evaluates judicial decisions governing peaceful demonstrations, university regulatory powers, police intervention, political influence, and contempt of lawful orders. It argues that while peaceful protest is a democratic entitlement, disruptive and violent agitations cannot be justified. The article recommends clearer institutional guidelines, designated protest spaces, enhanced grievance mechanisms, responsible policing, and balanced regulation to protect both constitutional freedoms and academic functioning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Mannat Singh

    Assistant Professor, Maharaja Surajmal Institute,
    Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, New Delhi

  • Prof. (Dr.) Anuj Kumar Vaksha

    Professor, University School of Law and Legal Studies,
    Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, New Delhi

References

1. Vidyasagar Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences v. Vidyasagar Hospital Employees,

124 (2005) DLT 640, (2006) ILLJ 781 Del, (2006) 142 PLR 9

2. Kerala Self Financing v. Mahatma Gandhi University, WP(C).No. 30126 of 2015 (M)

3. Mahaboob Basha v. Sambanda Reddiar, 1994(1) Crimes, 477

4. Union of India v. Niranjan Singh 1969 (1) SCC 502

5. Rama Narang v. Ramesh Narang and another, Contempt Petition (Civil) 148 of 2003

6. Ibid

7. Sukhdev Singh v. Hon’ble C.J.S. Teja Singh & Ors., AIR, 1954, SCR 454

8. Vidyasagar Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences v. Vidyasagar Hospital Employees,

124 (2005) DLT 640, (2006) ILLJ 781 Del, (2006) 142 PLR 9

9. provisions Page 1251 of the Industrial Disputes Act, (See Schedule V Entry 6.

10. All India Central Government Health Scheme Employees’ Association (Delhi Branch) v. Union

of India and Ors., W.P.(C) 5471/2008

11. Rama Muthuramalingam v. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mannargudi, 2004 (5) CTC

554

12. Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan v. Union of India and another, WP(C) No. 1153 of 2017

13. Government of Tamil Nadu and Others v. P Ayyakannu Lnind, WANo.1042 of 2018, CMP

No. 8772 of 2018

14. Corbin, C.M. (2009). The First Amendment right against compelled listening. BUL Rev., 89,

939, available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=

1292&context=fac_articles (Accessed: 05 August 2023).

15. P.A. Jacob v. Superintendent of Police, Kottayam, AIR 1993 Ker. 1: LNIND 1992 KER 217

Downloads

Published

2025-07-15

Issue

Section

Research Article